Thursday, September 15, 2016

The Importance of the Rhetorical Triangle

An argument is most effective when emotion is invoked, logic is utilized, and the author is credible.  Pathos, logos, and ethos make up the three points of Aristotle’s Rhetorical Triangle.  Effective argumentation is a careful balance of drawing a reader in by inducing an emotional response, presenting a logical argument, and building the writer’s credibility. 
According to Beth Hill, emotions will draw a reader in quicker than any other method an author can use.  Similar to shopping for a house, pathos is the exterior that makes the first impression.  A beautiful home exterior causes a buyer to go deeper and tour the inside, just as an emotional hook causes a reader to continue on and learn the argument.  The use of pathos creates a personal connection between the audience and the content. 
ASU shows that the use of logic provides substance to an argument and shows the truth of the writer’s words.  In a sense, logos is the foundation for the house that is a rhetorical argument.  Without a strong structure, a house will not continue to stand, just as an argument will not stand against scrutiny if it is not based in logic. 
European Rhetoric claims that ethos is the most important piece of the rhetorical argument.  The goal of ethos is to give the writer a trustworthy self-portrayal.  Ethos is the neighborhood.  A reader is more likely to consider an argument if it comes from a seemingly credible source.  People are more likely to buy a house in a nice neighborhood, somewhere that they can trust their home will not be vandalized or burglarized, than in a shady part of town. 
Without knowing it, people use the rhetorical triangle in everyday life.  Arguments in writing are similar to arguments in life:  they need emotional ties, logical foundations, and trustworthy sources.

Monday, September 5, 2016

Blog Post #1

The right to die, also known as "Dying with Dignity," is a very controversial topic.  Do we allow people to take their own lives and be free of severe pain?  Should we let God's will be what determines when a person will leave this world?  So long as enough signatures have been gained, this initiative will come to vote in Colorado this November.
As a Certified Nurse Aide, I care for many people who have been diagnosed with terminal illnesses. This initiative could change the way that my facility, and others, cares for those within their last six months of life.  Legalizing the prescription of life-ending medications could cause those at the end of their lives to be bullied into ending it all.  It could also allow people suffering from the unimaginable pain of cancer to end it before they become miserable enough to wish they were dead already.  I would imagine that facilities would still take people for end-of-life care, but what would happen to hospice care companies?
I do not know my stance on this issue, and I feel that writing an argumentative essay on this topic will help me to decide where I stand.  I can research and write about both sides of the issue, hopefully gaining enough insight to form my own educated opinion for voting this November.

http://www.denverpost.com/2016/07/05/right-to-die-colorado-ballot/